Review of ​Transcription by Ben Lerner

​Transcription by Ben Lerner is a novel centered around an enigmatic character, Thomas, as he is about to be interviewed, his death, and his involvement in his son and granddaughter’s life. The story starts off with one of his previous students gearing up to interview him, prepping in his hotel, dropping his phone in the sink, and losing the only recording device he will have for the interview with Thomas later. Though, for the interviewer, they’re able to partially reflect on their time in college and after with the moments surrounding Thomas, and then the circumstances in which he met his wife and had his own daughter. At Thomas’s place, because he’s in his 90’s, his mental facilities have slightly eroded, which make him start to think that his student may or not be his son. Even still, the interviewer isn’t able to use his phone so instead reconstructs the interview that is soon published. The second part of the novel follows immediately after the interviewer’s reveal of the published piece, in part being a fabricated conversation with Thomas, during Thomas’s memorial service. The interviewer doesn’t believe that he was in the wrong, though most of his collogues think different of him after. The final part is an extended interview with Thomas’s son, in part about Thomas being emotionally distant as a father, while also delving into his own struggles as a parent trying to get his daughter to eat.
 
Even though the novel is quite short, Lerner is able to pack a lot of emotional weight to the interviewer thinking about his own daughter or Thomas’s son feeling frustrated at his father. It is constructed somewhat unconventionally, and even while the majority of the novel is dialogue, it still feels like it speeds along. I think in part because it’s structured around Thomas’s death and that the interviews are describing events that happened.
 
The novel is very specifically a Covid story with the granddaughter doing school online, Thomas getting Covid and his call over FaceTime, and opening with the interviewer on the train with a mask. While I think that Covid is essential in the narrative, the novel already reads of its time even if it was published last month. I think what I mean is that because Covid—at least for the middle class—was a universally cushioned isolation its descriptions and discussions of Covid don’t feel fresh or unique. Of course, because it was a collective experience then these details don’t make anything particularly sticky. What is missing, which may be intentional, is the class of people who couldn’t get their groceries delivered to them—that in fact they were the ones delivering the groceries. I think this isn’t a particularity to Lerner’s novel, but this is more of my own skepticism of Covid narratives in general: they are middle or upper middle-class experiences that are softened by lower class struggle (and specifically that lower class struggle is barely mentioned). So, while Transcription is positioned in Covid time, and its narrative centers around Covid, its impact of Covid is aesthetic only. What I mean is that the only true impact that Covid could’ve had was Thomas’s intubation. Though, while Thomas is intubated, he doesn’t die. And for the purposes of the narrative, his intubation is required for his son to open up about his feelings. But in the narrative, it could’ve been any near-death event for Thomas’s son to talk openly.
 
Final Rating: 3.5/5